NVIDIA End of Life (EOL) Dates & Support Timeline
Complete end-of-life dates, support windows, and security status for all NVIDIA versions. Data sourced from endoflife.date and official vendor documentation. Updated at every deploy.
NVIDIA R615-Windows (NFB) is supported until September 9, 2027, its end-of-support date. The next NVIDIA version to reach end of life is R590-Windows (NFB), on December 22, 2026. 38 of 48 tracked NVIDIA versions are past end of life; the most recent to reach it, R575-Linux (NFB), did so on June 3, 2026. The full NVIDIA lifecycle, with every version's release and end-of-support date, is in the table below.
| Version | Latest Release | Release Date | EOL Date | Days | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R390-Linux LTS | 390.157 | Jan 4, 2018 | Nov 22, 2022 | 1393 days past EOL | EOL |
| R390-Windows LTS | 392.68 | Jan 8, 2018 | Oct 26, 2021 | 1785 days past EOL | EOL |
| R418-Linux LTS | 418.197.02 | Jan 30, 2019 | Mar 1, 2022 | 1659 days past EOL | EOL |
| R418-Windows LTS | 427.45 | Feb 4, 2019 | Mar 1, 2022 | 1659 days past EOL | EOL |
| R450-Linux LTS | 450.248.02 | Jun 24, 2020 | Jul 1, 2023 | 1172 days past EOL | EOL |
| R450-Windows LTS | 454.23 | Jun 24, 2020 | Jul 1, 2023 | 1172 days past EOL | EOL |
| R460-Windows (PB) | 463.15 | Dec 15, 2020 | Jan 1, 2022 | 1718 days past EOL | EOL |
| R460-Linux (PB) | 460.106.00 | Jan 7, 2021 | Jan 1, 2022 | 1718 days past EOL | EOL |
| R465-Linux (NFB) | 465.24.02 | Apr 19, 2021 | Apr 19, 2022 | 1610 days past EOL | EOL |
| R470-Windows LTS | 475.14 | Jun 22, 2021 | Jul 9, 2024 | 798 days past EOL | EOL |
| R470-Linux LTS | 470.256.02 | Jul 19, 2021 | Jul 20, 2024 | 787 days past EOL | EOL |
| R495-Windows (NFB) | 497.29 | Oct 12, 2021 | Jan 14, 2022 | 1705 days past EOL | EOL |
| R495-Linux (NFB) | 495.46 | Oct 26, 2021 | Oct 12, 2022 | 1434 days past EOL | EOL |
| R510-Linux (PB) | 510.108.03 | Jan 14, 2022 | Jan 1, 2023 | 1353 days past EOL | EOL |
| R510-Windows (PB) | 514.08 | Jan 14, 2022 | Jan 1, 2023 | 1353 days past EOL | EOL |
| R515-Linux (PB) | 515.105.01 | May 11, 2022 | May 1, 2023 | 1233 days past EOL | EOL |
| R515-Windows (PB) | 518.03 | May 11, 2022 | May 1, 2023 | 1233 days past EOL | EOL |
| R520-Linux (NFB) | 520.56.06 | Oct 12, 2022 | Oct 1, 2023 | 1080 days past EOL | EOL |
| R525-Linux (PB) | 525.147.05 | Nov 10, 2022 | Dec 1, 2023 | 1019 days past EOL | EOL |
| R525-Windows (PB) | 529.19 | Nov 10, 2022 | Dec 1, 2023 | 1019 days past EOL | EOL |
| R530-Windows (NFB) | 531.79 | Feb 28, 2023 | Jun 24, 2023 | 1179 days past EOL | EOL |
| R530-Linux (NFB) | 530.41.03 | Mar 23, 2023 | Jun 24, 2023 | 1179 days past EOL | EOL |
| R535-Windows LTS | 539.72 | May 30, 2023 | Jun 1, 2026 | 106 days past EOL | EOL |
| R535-Linux LTS | 535.309.01 | Jun 14, 2023 | Jun 1, 2026 | 106 days past EOL | EOL |
| R545-Windows (NFB) | 546.01 | Oct 17, 2023 | Oct 1, 2024 | 714 days past EOL | EOL |
| R545-Linux (NFB) | 545.29.06 | Oct 31, 2023 | Oct 1, 2024 | 714 days past EOL | EOL |
| R550-Windows (PB) | 553.74 | Feb 22, 2024 | Apr 17, 2025 | 516 days past EOL | EOL |
| R550-Linux (PB) | 550.163.01 | Feb 23, 2024 | Apr 17, 2025 | 516 days past EOL | EOL |
| R555-Windows (NFB) | 555.99 | Jun 4, 2024 | Jun 1, 2025 | 471 days past EOL | EOL |
| R555-Linux (NFB) | 555.58.02 | Jun 4, 2024 | Jun 1, 2025 | 471 days past EOL | EOL |
| R560-Windows (PB) | 560.94 | Jul 30, 2024 | Jul 30, 2025 | 412 days past EOL | EOL |
| R560-Linux (PB) | 560.35.03 | Aug 22, 2024 | Aug 22, 2025 | 389 days past EOL | EOL |
| R565-Windows (PB) | 566.03 | Oct 22, 2024 | Oct 1, 2025 | 349 days past EOL | EOL |
| R565-Linux (PB) | 565.57.01 | Oct 29, 2024 | Oct 1, 2025 | 349 days past EOL | EOL |
| R570-Windows (PB) | 573.76 | Jan 27, 2025 | Jan 27, 2026 | 231 days past EOL | EOL |
| R570-Linux (PB) | 570.211.01 | Jan 27, 2025 | Jan 27, 2026 | 231 days past EOL | EOL |
| R575-Windows (NFB) | 576.57 | Jun 3, 2025 | Jun 3, 2026 | 104 days past EOL | EOL |
| R575-Linux (NFB) | 575.57.08 | Jun 3, 2025 | Jun 3, 2026 | 104 days past EOL | EOL |
| R580-Windows LTS | 582.78 | Jun 3, 2025 | Aug 4, 2028 | 689 days remaining | Active |
| R580-Linux LTS | 580.178.04 | Aug 4, 2025 | Aug 4, 2028 | 689 days remaining | Active |
| R590-Linux (NFB) | 590.48.01 | Dec 22, 2025 | Dec 22, 2026 | 98 days remaining | Warning |
| R590-Windows (NFB) | 591.59 | Dec 22, 2025 | Dec 22, 2026 | 98 days remaining | Warning |
| R595-Linux (PB) | 595.91.07 | Mar 24, 2026 | Mar 24, 2027 | 190 days remaining | Active |
| R595-Windows (PB) | 596.86 | Mar 24, 2026 | Mar 24, 2027 | 190 days remaining | Active |
| R610-Linux (NFB) | 610.57.04 | Aug 3, 2026 | Aug 3, 2027 | 322 days remaining | Active |
| R610-Windows (NFB) | 610.88 | Aug 3, 2026 | Aug 3, 2027 | 322 days remaining | Active |
| R615-Windows (NFB) | 615.71.09 | Sep 9, 2026 | Sep 9, 2027 | 359 days remaining | Active |
| R615-Windows (NFB) | 616.92 | Sep 9, 2026 | Sep 9, 2027 | 359 days remaining | Active |
[](https://endoflife.ai/nvidia)
NVIDIA release and support pattern
12 of the 48 tracked lines are designated long-term support, which is where the longer windows sit.
Of the 48 release lines tracked, 38 are past end of life and 10 are still within support. The newest line, r615-windows, was released September 9, 2026. The next scheduled end of life is r590-windows on December 22, 2026 — 98 days from this build. The longest-supported line currently published is r580-windows, to August 4, 2028.
Computed from the tracked release data at every build — the figures above are the dates in the table, restated, not an editorial estimate.
What does NVIDIA end of life mean for your organization?
When a version of NVIDIA reaches end of life, the maintainers stop issuing security patches. Vulnerabilities discovered after this date are publicly disclosed on the National Vulnerability Database, exploit code appears on GitHub, and your systems remain permanently exposed.
The CVE blind spot: Most vulnerability scanners check for known CVEs but do not flag the accumulation of unpatched vulnerabilities in EOL software. With a zero-day, nobody knows about the vulnerability. With EOL software, the vulnerability is public — listed, rated, and often weaponized — but no patch will ever exist. This is the most dangerous gap in enterprise security posture.
Organizations running EOL NVIDIA should treat it as a vulnerability class in their risk register, apply compensating controls (network segmentation, enhanced monitoring, access restriction), and prioritize migration to a supported version.
Your options when NVIDIA reaches end of life
There are four realistic paths. Which one is right depends far more on how long the system needs to keep running than on the version you are on today.
| Option | Best when | Watch out for |
|---|---|---|
| Move to a supported version | The system will outlive the current version's support window and you can schedule the work | Budget for compatibility testing, not just the upgrade itself — that is where the real cost sits |
| Replace the component | The project is unmaintained, or a better-supported alternative exists | The replacement has its own lifecycle and its own end-of-life date — you are changing vendors, not escaping the problem |
| Commercial extended support | Not available for NVIDIA from the original maintainer | Third-party vendors patch some end-of-life software on a custom basis; availability depends on the specific version and source access |
| Document accepted risk | The system is isolated, short-lived, or scheduled for retirement | Only defensible with real compensating controls and a written decision — auditors treat undocumented end-of-life software as a finding |
How to choose, in one question: how many more years does this system need to run? Under a year, extended support (where it exists) is usually cheaper than an emergency migration. One to three years, migrate — support purchased repeatedly costs more than doing the project once, and the project only gets harder as the version ages. Indefinitely, migrate now and plan the next migration before it surprises you.
Worth saying plainly, because vendors selling extended support rarely will: extended support is often the more expensive choice over a multi-year horizon. It is the right answer when a deadline is genuinely unreachable, not as a default. Compare the annual fee against the one-time cost of migrating before committing to either.
Upload requirements.txt, package.json, or Gemfile — full EOL report instantly.
Open Stack Scanner →